Search for: "United States of America v. An Amount of Funds up to but not to exceed " Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States of America and the Republic of Nicaragua, being desirous to confirm their friendly relations and to promote the cause of justice, have resolved to conclude a treaty for the extradition of fugitives from justice between the United States of America and the Republic of Nicaragua, and have appointed for that purpose the following Plenipotentiaries: The President of the United States of America, John Hay,… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
The actual “trigger” for extra public funds can occur by either the spending of the self-financed candidate directly, or by independent groups that support that candidate if the amount such groups spend added to that of the candidate exceeds the initial subsidy amount. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Award Information Anticipated Type of Award:  Cooperative Agreement Estimated Number of Awards: 1 Anticipated Funding Amount:  $130,000 The funding amount is contingent on fiscal year 2018 funding availability. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SHORT TITLE section 1. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm by Jon
Civil trials:Trial by a randomly selected jury of twelve in whichthe amount at issue, including costs, exceeds theequivalent of at least 15.46875 troy ounces of puresilver.4. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
MAP-21, expires on September 30th, and without action to extend the Highway Trust Fund, all payments to states stop on October 1st. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, before it), Umaña v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by Jeralyn
Neither the State Department nor DEA's budget numbers include the amounts for drug war funding by the Justice Department (2012 drug budget here), FBI, or Homeland Security. [read post]